Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:59:02 +0100
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20070129235902.GB8882@enneenne.com>
References: <20070129230755.GA8705@enneenne.com> <1170114826.5833.139.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1170114826.5833.139.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Organization: GNU/Linux Device Drivers, Embedded Systems and Courses
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: Re: Advice on APM-EMU reunion
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 945
Lines: 25

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:53:46PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:

> I'm not sure this is a good idea. As you're creating a new interface,
> why not create something new/improved without the problems that
> confining yourself to APM emulation brings?

Because several applications (and expecially in embedded systems) use
that interface. However adding a sysfs support I try to define a new
(and most versatile) interface.

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                             giometti@gnudd.com
Embedded Systems                     		giometti@linux.it
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/