Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650E6C433FE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234225AbiADOcV (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:32:21 -0500 Received: from out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.133]:58107 "EHLO out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231733AbiADOcU (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:32:20 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R251e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04423;MF=ashimida@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=10;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0V0xwPGf_1641306736; Received: from 192.168.193.151(mailfrom:ashimida@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0V0xwPGf_1641306736) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:32:17 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] aarch64: scs: reload shadow call stack in user exception entry To: Mark Rutland Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, maz@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, pcc@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org References: <20211228010604.109572-1-ashimida@linux.alibaba.com> From: Dan Li Message-ID: <4d79d1e0-8320-4d9f-d847-ac83032c71df@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 06:32:16 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/4/22 2:40 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:06:04PM -0800, Dan Li wrote: >> When el0 exception occurs, kernel_entry/exit will load/save tsk->scs_sp >> to ensure scs working properly. AFAIK, the SCS offset should always be >> 0 at this time. >> >> Is it reasonable to reload x18 to scs_base directly in kernel_entry >> here, or am I missing something? >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Li > > AFAICT the saving here is just that we avoid storing the SCS SP upon return to > EL0, and I suspect that in practice that's not measureable. > > So without numbers to show otherwise, I'd prefer to leave this as-is, though I > agree that this patch should work. If we do want to change this, I think we > need a comment in the `kernel_exit` path to pair with the `scs_load` in > `kernel_entry`. > > Thanks, > Mark. > Yes, there is only one instruction saved here, which should have a minimal impact on performance. The current code is also good for me :) Thanks, Dan. >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h | 7 +++++++ >> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 3 +-- >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h >> index 8297bccf0784..2bc0d0575e75 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h >> @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ >> #ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK >> scs_sp .req x18 >> >> + .macro scs_reload tsk >> + ldr scs_sp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_SCS_BASE] >> + .endm >> + >> .macro scs_load tsk >> ldr scs_sp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_SCS_SP] >> .endm >> @@ -17,6 +21,9 @@ >> str scs_sp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_SCS_SP] >> .endm >> #else >> + .macro scs_reload tsk >> + .endm >> + >> .macro scs_load tsk >> .endm >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S >> index bc6d5a970a13..57547a3e4f7c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH >> alternative_else_nop_endif >> 1: >> >> - scs_load tsk >> + scs_reload tsk >> .else >> add x21, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE >> get_current_task tsk >> @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_845719 >> alternative_else_nop_endif >> #endif >> 3: >> - scs_save tsk >> >> /* Ignore asynchronous tag check faults in the uaccess routines */ >> ldr x0, [tsk, THREAD_SCTLR_USER] >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>