Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964860AbXA3Dli (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:41:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964930AbXA3Dli (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:41:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39712 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964860AbXA3Dlh (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:41:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:41:11 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Greg Ungerer Cc: Jes Sorensen , Theodore Tso , Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com, alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Message-ID: <20070130034111.GB21772@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Greg Ungerer , Jes Sorensen , Theodore Tso , Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com, alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, David Miller References: <20070123.095756.30177490.davem@davemloft.net> <20070125.125121.98861775.davem@davemloft.net> <8355959a0701251646t4b7db48cj862268aad52e8e24@mail.gmail.com> <20070126032849.GB5589@thunk.org> <8355959a0701260704x6aea8141s3d0581fa33c74cf2@mail.gmail.com> <20070126195024.GE14759@thunk.org> <45BE8BF9.6020204@sgi.com> <20070130030430.GA21772@redhat.com> <45BEBBF0.3050102@snapgear.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45BEBBF0.3050102@snapgear.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1217 Lines: 28 On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:30:56PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:06:17AM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > Then there is the issue of architectures, at least in my book KS should > > > focus on the ones that are really live and not in maintenance mode. > > > x86_64, x86_32, PPC, ia64, ARM seems to be the driving ones these days, > > > m68k, Sparc32, and others, somewhat less so ..... > > > > Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or > > sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented. > > Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k > for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much > contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion. Right, other than during the CPU architects panel, I don't remember any non x86/ia64/ppc stuff being brought up at all. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/