Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933034AbXA3GUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:20:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933085AbXA3GUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:20:11 -0500 Received: from smtp.ocgnet.org ([64.20.243.3]:35372 "EHLO smtp.ocgnet.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933034AbXA3GUJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:20:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:18:22 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Andi Kleen Cc: ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@redhat.com, David Miller , Sunil Naidu Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Message-ID: <20070130061822.GA19543@linux-sh.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Mundt , Andi Kleen , ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@redhat.com, David Miller , Sunil Naidu References: <20070123.095756.30177490.davem@davemloft.net> <45BEBBF0.3050102@snapgear.com> <20070130034111.GB21772@redhat.com> <200701300611.18409.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701300611.18409.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1442 Lines: 29 On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:11:18AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 30 January 2007 04:41, Dave Jones wrote: > > Right, other than during the CPU architects panel, I don't remember > > any non x86/ia64/ppc stuff being brought up at all. > > No IA64 stuff that I can remember. And there was a presentation on PPC. > > But that was planned to be differently with more focus on embedded, > unfortunately the comittee didn't manage to find more embedded CPU > people in time. > It might be interesting to have a more condensed CPU panel, something like the OLS lightning talks. Gather a larger number of vendors, and give each a small window to bring up the most relevant issues for them in the future, while also allowing for some feedback and Q&A. It would be nice to get more input from CPU architects, but only if it's possible to keep it entirely technical and moving along without anyone having to hurry their window of time due to someone else overstepping theirs. If they only have a small window to present their concerns, I think we'll see a lot of the fluff (as itemized by davej) go away. As soon as a vendor starts rambling on about value-added IP blocks, we've already lost.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/