Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0390AC433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234075AbiAEJjS (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:39:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60392 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234083AbiAEJif (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:38:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0237C061784; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 01:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id o3so23507567wrh.10; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 01:38:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dUITgGtpL31IeX6cwiB/AlKUldEsi1k26xqsJqiQSOM=; b=nRh5YcuZ8DiWWz0Z+4oo3DgEHCGhLb+JBPcwXTWQXoEk1KBCwHueJXc5guFL52Nan6 RXheLpr0c3FfYlYWrzuJli+nnKJHC8Qangb7uBRIh1UD338gzSt4BJzJZDeXV1CRFuYx GSdrgKne0zTN72Oz5fcsTIPt218nGGIoq0Gi1eTkmsymKRAwQ4RXGT2EnnpyFjSQPdLD aFC1bWxXF3jslf5nECnJdFxdde9pzncV5UEMeykZaDTJEbnc8f3t4zp+70gcpbV4vkGU AnpoI/Qx5P9acoQzIyX6QygaJLFGHVU4NDxWsxGpjoYVlAU+Hfky9Rg6EwDR2HEZEynp T3Tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dUITgGtpL31IeX6cwiB/AlKUldEsi1k26xqsJqiQSOM=; b=ufZWZmkM+PHVGJDva3t3LjCAAKNe7cdOaMDm71/UMpjFI2/WJOON5ZJx80ukbKvcPh zQmXHnaoRVLkXgbLllnl+MW4TQi1iTWYqMvMfm4HmjVGbJxqex+2CJcFInAxdZLQOdDk SsO2/l6cbAnMTJ9gvrC56YRiBJXDv0lx6b0JKqW92CsaH6k0AEN25PoKpG8/484chibo ET7lcy0FWGl1DuMAMpmmHc7nSFWSR9g75Y54LUqG7vcIuVRokuswzb7hlRCgu0zxZ/hm JjbxMAzcW0Klg0NdExlgAZlJpb2ePLdePo90UhxDG+WOBrIpgsE5EoFBYPUtUjBHcFa+ INbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335O3mOYchEtqmMZUTy4onhMcTHsYgQjg4+TGkZXfNLM/9t9VBv 9my1R8sMkfiPbsLYDZBgm60= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGu5yvfwfmJ5cd7qmD4alqvCMEMhR+piYMP7nabQY4YPI5lMNDF6EkNCj+xZQXTnnrFAJ0CA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:168e:: with SMTP id y14mr47066460wrd.492.1641375513425; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 01:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm45240720wrd.100.2022.01.05.01.38.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jan 2022 01:38:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:38:31 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.90-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220104073841.681360658@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220104073841.681360658@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:41:05AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.90 release. > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/588 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/589 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip