Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C07DC433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239510AbiAEKvD (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 05:51:03 -0500 Received: from infomag.iguana.be ([185.87.124.46]:46966 "EHLO infomag.iguana.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234716AbiAEKvB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 05:51:01 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 434 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:51:01 EST Received: by infomag.iguana.be (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 86175603CACE; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:43:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 infomag.iguana.be 86175603CACE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iguana.be; s=infomag-20180602; t=1641379426; bh=lw3p1ytN1IY1ZXpUMw/aZ08wl5V0Hg0ZBj+0zckFgx4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WLDonfFx2tWB6gqkECmAW0I1FJMpMchAN27njhV8lzX5hjlQ4P0WaKUPHN5VRNiYp W3R4h6hVCgdavChZZfpIEj10pAFVuskoHVIxVtx7Ny8FcuHUkOEzPKTBRNtsv6sK5H k2aGbcBhfPwl3YTQekgqdbShp0+hvuDLsm2+J5ZA= Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:43:46 +0100 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Andrej Picej Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Sam Protsenko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the watchdog tree Message-ID: <20220105104346.GA15162@infomag.iguana.be> References: <20220104083659.4e5f2754@canb.auug.org.au> <432b6c61-f8c6-368d-2386-590bed2aee7a@norik.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <432b6c61-f8c6-368d-2386-590bed2aee7a@norik.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, > Hi Stephan, > > On 3. 01. 22 22:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >In commit > > > > 02d04e694fa3 ("watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock") > > > >Fixes tag > > > > Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock") > > > >has these problem(s): > > > > - Target SHA1 does not exist > > > >Maybe you meant > > > >Fixes: e249d01b5e8b ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock") > > > >In commit > > > > ce3401c72f01 ("watchdog: da9063: Add hard dependency on I2C") > > > >Fixes tag > > > > Fixes: 5ea29919c294 ("watchdog: da9063: use atomic safe i2c transfer in reset handler") > > > >has these problem(s): > > > > - Target SHA1 does not exist > > > >Maybe you meant > > > >Fixes: 968011a291f3 ("watchdog: da9063: use atomic safe i2c transfer in reset handler") > > > > Yes, that's probably right for my patch, sorry for that. > > I was puzzled on where to get the SHA1 of not-yet applied commit, > because this patches ("watchdog: da9063: use atomic safe i2c > transfer in reset handler" and the fix "watchdog: da9063: Add hard > dependency on I2C") followed quite closely together. Is there any > way that I can get the SHA1 of the commit that was applied? It > should be a part of some branch right? I'm asking because I couldn't > find a repo or a branch that this two commits are a part of. > > Anyway should I send a v2, or what is the procedure here? I'll fix that. Kind reards, Wim.