Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932834AbXA3Kda (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:33:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933148AbXA3Kda (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:33:30 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:55498 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932834AbXA3Kd2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:33:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:33:20 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: James Bottomley Cc: Jes Sorensen , Dave Jones , Theodore Tso , Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com, alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Message-ID: <20070130103320.GC10526@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Jes Sorensen , Dave Jones , Theodore Tso , Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com, alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, David Miller References: <20070125.125121.98861775.davem@davemloft.net> <8355959a0701251646t4b7db48cj862268aad52e8e24@mail.gmail.com> <20070126032849.GB5589@thunk.org> <8355959a0701260704x6aea8141s3d0581fa33c74cf2@mail.gmail.com> <20070126195024.GE14759@thunk.org> <45BE8BF9.6020204@sgi.com> <20070130030430.GA21772@redhat.com> <45BECEB4.6060905@sgi.com> <1170133914.3378.55.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1170133914.3378.55.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 983 Lines: 22 On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:11:54PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > Networking > Wireless > Filesystems > Storage > Power Management > > And probably several others I can't remember. Right at the moment, the > organisation and funding for all of these is completely ad-hoc, so if > mini summits are the way to go, it would certainly be better to move > them on to a more templated basis (so anyone wishing to organise one > would know whom to go to for these things). One thing that might have made these mini-summits so successull might have been the ad-hoc setup without much corporate or organizational involvement. I'm looking forward to see if we can keep this spirit despite the Usenix involvement for the next FS/Storage summit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/