From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: maynardj@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 3/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:35:42 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <45BE4ED0.5030808@us.ibm.com> <200701300524.32556.arnd@arndb.de> <45BF64DC.7040506@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <45BF64DC.7040506@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200701310135.43383.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 908
Lines: 19

On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:31, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> 
> > On solution would be to move the notify_active flag from ctx->spu
> > into ctx itself, but maybe there are other ways to solve this.
> In an earlier review of this patch, Christopher Hellwig suggested I move 
> the notify_active flag to be a bit in the sched_flags field that's added 
> in his scheduler patch series. ?If this patch series will be a available 
> in an "Arnd" tree that we'll be using for our current OProfile 
> development, perhaps I should wait until that time to change this, since 
> the window of vulnerability is quite small. ?What do you think?

Sounds good to me.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/