Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932088AbXAaAmy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:42:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932095AbXAaAmy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:42:54 -0500 Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([64.109.89.108]:39545 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932088AbXAaAmx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:42:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit From: James Bottomley To: Jes Sorensen Cc: alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org In-Reply-To: <45BFB785.5090302@sgi.com> References: <20070123.095756.30177490.davem@davemloft.net> <20070125.125121.98861775.davem@davemloft.net> <8355959a0701251646t4b7db48cj862268aad52e8e24@mail.gmail.com> <20070126032849.GB5589@thunk.org> <8355959a0701260704x6aea8141s3d0581fa33c74cf2@mail.gmail.com> <20070126195024.GE14759@thunk.org> <45BE8BF9.6020204@sgi.com> <1170118042.3378.45.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <45BEF0C5.7090401@sgi.com> <1170177057.3420.32.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <45BFB785.5090302@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:42:48 -0600 Message-Id: <1170204168.10890.5.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1362 Lines: 34 On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 22:24 +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 08:16 +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> I don't have an issue with the fact there are sponsors, however I think > >> KS is important enough and sponsors are aware of this, that selling > >> seats to sponsors shouldn't be necessary. > > > > So SGI will undertake to step up and sponsor KS this year without a > > guaranteed slot? > > I didn't realize that all your postings to this list were the official > views of Steeleye? That would make two of us then. > I can't say what SGI will do on this, I'm an engineer not a manager, > I can however suggest to them that they do. As Willy said, if it was > an even playing field it would probably be a lot more likely they would, > compared to how it is today. OK, but what I'm trying to get across is that saying "get rid of the sponsored places" isn't really useful without a suggestion of how to raise the necessary cash. Saying "I talked to SGI and they'd be willing to forgo their sponsored attendees if everyone else did" might get us somewhere... James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/