Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:43:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:43:48 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:20496 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:43:36 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: vda To: Ryan Cumming Subject: Re: OOM killer in 2.4.15pre1 still not 100% ok Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:42:40 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01112217224700.01298@manta> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01112219424001.01298@manta> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 November 2001 14:15, Ryan Cumming wrote: > On November 22, 2001 11:22, vda wrote: > > Today I saw OOM killer in action for the very fist time. > > Just want to inform that it still not 100% ok (IMHO): > > > > I reconfigured my text box for NFS root fs operation > > and turned off swap. The box has 128M RAM. > > ... > > > 5:01pm up 1:08, 3 users, load average: 0.18, 0.10, 0.06 > > 61 processes: 58 sleeping, 2 running, 1 zombie, 0 stopped > > CPU states: 1.9% user, 15.6% system, 0.0% nice, 82.3% idle > > Mem: 126272K av, 123428K used, 2844K free, 0K shrd, 16K buff > >Swap: 0K av, 0K used, 0K free 47748K cached > > Er, with almost 3megs of free memory and -47megs- of cache, the problem > isn't with the OOM killer's selection, but the fact it was triggered with > nearly half the RAM still usable. Do you actually know the OOM killer was > triggered? Or did top just mysteriously exit? I have no swap at all. There was a message "Out of Memory: killing process top" or something such on screen. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/