Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:58:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:58:09 -0500 Received: from c0mailgw.prontomail.com ([216.163.180.10]:11482 "EHLO c0mailgw09.prontomail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:58:02 -0500 Message-ID: <3BFD3C6B.B23D0A97@starband.net> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:56:59 -0500 From: war X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James A Sutherland CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Swap vs No Swap. In-Reply-To: <3BFC5A9B.915B77DF@starband.net> <3BFD2709.31A1A85E@starband.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thank you for understanding! James A Sutherland wrote: > On Thursday 22 November 2001 4:25 pm, war wrote: > > Why have SWAP if you don't need it - answer that.? > > Having it is supposed to improve performance. If you take two identical > machines, and enable swap on one but not the other, the first machine should > have better performance: it can cache the FS more effectively. > > Now, if you have INSANE amounts of RAM (i.e. enough to have everything > running in RAM *AND* every file you access cached) the swap will make no > difference at all. Under any other circumstances, it should make things > better. > > James. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/