Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751486AbXAaISw (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:18:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751457AbXAaISw (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:18:52 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:45362 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751438AbXAaISv (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:18:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:18:31 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Jones , Paul Mundt , Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Message-ID: <20070131081831.GB25032@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Dave Jones , Paul Mundt , Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org References: <20070126195024.GE14759@thunk.org> <45BE8BF9.6020204@sgi.com> <20070130030430.GA21772@redhat.com> <45BEBBF0.3050102@snapgear.com> <20070130034111.GB21772@redhat.com> <45BEC303.2040205@securecomputing.com> <20070130040826.GA19362@linux-sh.org> <20070130043421.GE21772@redhat.com> <20070130103044.GB10526@infradead.org> <1170175725.3420.15.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1170175725.3420.15.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1283 Lines: 26 On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:48:45AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > Well, OK, but the next question is that is some form of panel of > outsiders still a useful feature? > > Previous panels we've done have been: > > * Device Drivers - Inputs from vendors trying to get code into the > kernel. I had feedback that this was reasonably useful; the > problem is that it tends to be composed of vendors already > making a big effort on the open source process and not the ones > (like graphics) who aren't. > * Customer Panel - inputs from various users deploying linux in > their enterprises. This did tend to degenerate quickly to a > list of requirements. > > The one everyone seems to want is chipsets, so is this the one we want > to shoot for this year? chipsets is probably more interesting than cpus, yes. Most useful would be other open source projects and their requirements/wishes from the kernel, but we're already discussing that elsewhere in this maze of threads.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/