Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965222AbXAaPRD (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:17:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965239AbXAaPRD (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:17:03 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:60407 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965222AbXAaPRB (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:17:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:46:47 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: "Chris Friesen" Cc: riel@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Fair-user scheduler Message-ID: <20070131151647.GA23004@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <20070126060142.GA2487@in.ibm.com> <45BA4B57.1070604@nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45BA4B57.1070604@nortel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 29 On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:41:27PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > As Kirill brought up, why does it take so much more time? Are you > thrashing the cache? Yes, the default 1-sec control window I had was causing lot of thrashing. See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/31/142 > Presumably this would be made generic, as in per-"group" rather than per > user? Ideally yes! But I am trying to apply the solution to an existing problem and later extend for other needs as well. > > - Fairsched aware SMP load balance NOT addressed (yet) > > This is kind of important, no? Yea again! I have again avoided it to keep the patch simple at first. Based on interest/response, I can address this later. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/