Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965161AbXAaPym (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:54:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965166AbXAaPyl (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:54:41 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:39485 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965161AbXAaPyl (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:54:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:54:39 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Pavel Machek cc: Oliver Neukum , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Oliver Neukum , pm list , Subject: Re: [linux-pm] question on resume() In-Reply-To: <20070131093653.GA19643@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1940 Lines: 57 On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > Yes, it will. The process freezer can only return success if there are no more > > > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks. Otherwise it fails (after a timeout). > > > > So, this means, on suspend(): > > > > 1. Don't worry about TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE > > 2. Do worry about TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE > > We have to cease IO and must not call wake_up_interruptible() > > "cease IO"? No, I believe it is enough not to start new I/O. Userspace > is frozen at that point, it can't ask you to do I/O. There may be I/O requests sitting in a queue, already submitted by userspace. The suspend method should wait for existing I/O to complete and stop processing new entries from the queue. > > Isn't that a race until suspend() is called? > > I do not think so. The part about not calling wake_up_interruptible() is indeed a race. We have: 1. Task is frozen. 2. Driver must not call wake_up_interruptible(). 3. Driver's suspend() method is called. How is the driver supposed to satisfy (2) before (3) has occurred? In fact this shouldn't matter. There shouldn't be anything wrong with calling wake_up_interruptible() on a frozen task. > > On resume(): > > > > 1. Don't worry about TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE > > 2. Do not restart IO that may call wake_up_interruptible() > > > > When do we restart such IO? > > We reuse signal handling code to do that for us. It is same situation > as when someone signals task doing I/O. Again you misunderstood the question. The driver must start queued I/O when its resume() method is called. It should then be okay for the driver to call wake_up_interruptible(), even before tasks are unfrozen. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/