Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:14:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:14:25 -0500 Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-5-109.abo.wanadoo.fr ([80.11.136.109]:44421 "EHLO strider.virtualdomain.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:14:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3BFD4F57.8030408@wanadoo.fr> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:17:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Cami User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James A Sutherland Cc: Rik van Riel , war , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Swap vs No Swap. In-Reply-To: <3BFD4A42.8090002@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James A Sutherland wrote: >>Obviously the problem is very much lessened, in my case, when >>i put the swap partition on the *other* drive than the root fs. >>Both are ATA100 (40GB 60GXPs), and the system is more responsive >>with swap on hdc while / in on hda, than both on hda. >> > > Hmm... if you've experimented with this, how does this setup compare to a > striped RAID of hda+hdc used for root and swap? (i.e. is the speedup down to > splitting accesses between two spindles?) I haven't, but it's a good idea, I may give it a try, but not very soon. Fran?ois - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/