Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73B0C433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244464AbiAEVbg (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:31:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54030 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244442AbiAEVbb (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:31:31 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2F6C061245 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id i65-20020a252244000000b0060b2e5fd54cso1167763ybi.13 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:31:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=VaVcglQQWQyd+D8xYsm++asUm3d2zSMstiXGMzeYRRg=; b=kj1vfpt24GWSpAOGOWS2UytnuxnopwczjTyCX+z1ZrjgUheyWTWtg6bWynnkzj2fdm UV/+xl5xP7XCi3+G620jWUFNsXvmh6yWWJUy+T8DPzCplzJF/jcKxtj6sYGqhhZZPQ2u bwSrItZeQTwHivQqCl0xHBjbhSexP5bvjfQo2uQVMIHWdsUCavQ0dOic24pxkbFR4/oQ lnzYS2teYKOSK0hzWIXv/yjLgvZD9YFNFoj+8OOcrRSBbLSHZIBbdjB9u34C048e7sjV odg2R5dJ25nrJ2DVgJSp8IOhnZHskaPs4w2cPfd/L0DkR6BwogtRzbkP2KPJUziJ86Bh B0gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=VaVcglQQWQyd+D8xYsm++asUm3d2zSMstiXGMzeYRRg=; b=b91NrzVsSZuBddvhugPQ9S15iSzx7sC849x/dM034rDh3gkICvZeoPS1uIhl3G9+bz xm7A/Bn3VGoe6c+Kq444B0BqjjPbgP2ykKVa3QG07ttFGzhDOryerEYrzWTDIX1FuWS4 EgVJU4OPSwux0EKphC0LUeWHYLUCcrtj3SnUlWCylbTQRcao/T/SE638yTI8pG32odTo zoU1+F4zhRAhNwuEIMoG7tYtuageDfKRaWY/jDwAA5bjL02gw0QPRCfhegjerz6L43uJ cU6aziCBiwWCqSl+j7ScFa9DW9S8k/4HghDhDU/mDccf4SjbxnB1q+VHdrRE3UJfpZWz 5adQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531f5HFRBrnSdfp2mvb8Ys96Iwum65LyO2REXmtTc4GwN9emyUPI 8KRAndXCd3oYy9fUh22mon7cRWHn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyC91nLMMhW+wKBzgEuZ5ccUrlcKq4EblaVq/f9QvMsMSM37Xu5zlM1VyNMQqEBZIkJOt3ocfaP X-Received: from gnomeregan.cam.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:6:412:3ab7:a23:e07a:5e22]) (user=brho job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:c385:: with SMTP id t127mr41305535ybf.562.1641418290619; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:31:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:28:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20220105212828.197013-1-brho@google.com> Message-Id: <20220105212828.197013-3-brho@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220105212828.197013-1-brho@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] prlimit: make do_prlimit() static From: Barret Rhoden To: ebiederm@xmission.com Cc: Christian Brauner , Andrew Morton , Alexey Gladkov , William Cohen , Viresh Kumar , Alexey Dobriyan , Chris Hyser , Peter Collingbourne , Xiaofeng Cao , David Hildenbrand , Cyrill Gorcunov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There are no other callers in the kernel. Fixed up a comment format and whitespace issue when moving do_prlimit() higher in sys.c. Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden --- include/linux/resource.h | 2 - kernel/sys.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/resource.h b/include/linux/resource.h index bdf491cbcab7..4fdbc0c3f315 100644 --- a/include/linux/resource.h +++ b/include/linux/resource.h @@ -8,7 +8,5 @@ struct task_struct; void getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int who, struct rusage *ru); -int do_prlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource, - struct rlimit *new_rlim, struct rlimit *old_rlim); #endif diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c index 558e52fa5bbd..fb2a5e7c0589 100644 --- a/kernel/sys.c +++ b/kernel/sys.c @@ -1415,6 +1415,65 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setdomainname, char __user *, name, int, len) return errno; } +/* make sure you are allowed to change @tsk limits before calling this */ +static int do_prlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource, + struct rlimit *new_rlim, struct rlimit *old_rlim) +{ + struct rlimit *rlim; + int retval = 0; + + if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS) + return -EINVAL; + if (new_rlim) { + if (new_rlim->rlim_cur > new_rlim->rlim_max) + return -EINVAL; + if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && + new_rlim->rlim_max > sysctl_nr_open) + return -EPERM; + } + + /* protect tsk->signal and tsk->sighand from disappearing */ + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + if (!tsk->sighand) { + retval = -ESRCH; + goto out; + } + + rlim = tsk->signal->rlim + resource; + task_lock(tsk->group_leader); + if (new_rlim) { + /* + * Keep the capable check against init_user_ns until cgroups can + * contain all limits. + */ + if (new_rlim->rlim_max > rlim->rlim_max && + !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) + retval = -EPERM; + if (!retval) + retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim); + } + if (!retval) { + if (old_rlim) + *old_rlim = *rlim; + if (new_rlim) + *rlim = *new_rlim; + } + task_unlock(tsk->group_leader); + + /* + * RLIMIT_CPU handling. Arm the posix CPU timer if the limit is not + * infinite. In case of RLIM_INFINITY the posix CPU timer code + * ignores the rlimit. + */ + if (!retval && new_rlim && resource == RLIMIT_CPU && + new_rlim->rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS)) + update_rlimit_cpu(tsk, new_rlim->rlim_cur); +out: + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + return retval; +} + SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getrlimit, unsigned int, resource, struct rlimit __user *, rlim) { struct rlimit value; @@ -1558,63 +1617,6 @@ static void rlim64_to_rlim(const struct rlimit64 *rlim64, struct rlimit *rlim) rlim->rlim_max = (unsigned long)rlim64->rlim_max; } -/* make sure you are allowed to change @tsk limits before calling this */ -int do_prlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource, - struct rlimit *new_rlim, struct rlimit *old_rlim) -{ - struct rlimit *rlim; - int retval = 0; - - if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS) - return -EINVAL; - if (new_rlim) { - if (new_rlim->rlim_cur > new_rlim->rlim_max) - return -EINVAL; - if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && - new_rlim->rlim_max > sysctl_nr_open) - return -EPERM; - } - - /* protect tsk->signal and tsk->sighand from disappearing */ - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); - if (!tsk->sighand) { - retval = -ESRCH; - goto out; - } - - rlim = tsk->signal->rlim + resource; - task_lock(tsk->group_leader); - if (new_rlim) { - /* Keep the capable check against init_user_ns until - cgroups can contain all limits */ - if (new_rlim->rlim_max > rlim->rlim_max && - !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) - retval = -EPERM; - if (!retval) - retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim); - } - if (!retval) { - if (old_rlim) - *old_rlim = *rlim; - if (new_rlim) - *rlim = *new_rlim; - } - task_unlock(tsk->group_leader); - - /* - * RLIMIT_CPU handling. Arm the posix CPU timer if the limit is not - * infinite. In case of RLIM_INFINITY the posix CPU timer code - * ignores the rlimit. - */ - if (!retval && new_rlim && resource == RLIMIT_CPU && - new_rlim->rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY && - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS)) - update_rlimit_cpu(tsk, new_rlim->rlim_cur); -out: - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); - return retval; -} - /* rcu lock must be held */ static int check_prlimit_permission(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int flags) -- 2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog