Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Message-Id: <164142600886.21166.4094526896575840947.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 05 Jan 2022 23:40:08 +0000
References: <20211227130713.66933-1-wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211227130713.66933-1-wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com>
To:     Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com>
Cc:     ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
        kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
        hengqi.chen@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhouchengming@bytedance.com,
        songmuchun@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
        shekairui@bytedance.com
Precedence: bulk

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 21:07:12 +0800 you wrote:
> Fix a bug in commit 46ed5fc33db9, which wrongly used the
> func_name instead of probe_name to register legacy kprobe.
> 
> Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code")
> Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/71cff670baff
  - [v2,2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/51a33c60f1c2

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html