Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933357AbXAaXw4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:52:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933358AbXAaXw4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:52:56 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:55385 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933357AbXAaXwz (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:52:55 -0500 To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Jes Sorensen , Dave Jones , Matt Domsch , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, James Bottomley , alan@redhat.com Reply-To: Gerrit Huizenga From: Gerrit Huizenga Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:30:43 PST. <45C126A3.8040005@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:52:43 -0800 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1992 Lines: 42 On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:30:43 PST, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > Don't confused KS with a conference; > > it is a workshop for a very, very large, very very active project. > > ... and *growing*, which is the real issue I think. > > Something that might make sense for KS is to have multiple sessions > (perhaps replacing some or all of the "mini-summits" that have cropped > up) combined with some bigger, overall sessions. At least that way > there would be more cross-pollination between the various groups than if > we eventually end up meeting everywhere. > > That's of course only practical if KS is separated from any other > conference (like OLS.) Are you thinking something like "core VM/scheduler/locking/etc." as one set of not-quite-so-mini-summit, and a "block IO/storage drivers/filesystems" as another, "arch maintainers" as another, and "all the nutty drivers and their writers" as perhaps a fourth? In other words, some semi-logical grouping of issues each as more free floating meetings? Or did I miss your suggestion? Easy on the judgement on practicality, btw. For instance, FAST is going to try to do some part of one of these - possibly larger than a networking mini-summit in scope but otherwise with similar goals. I think there are some options to consider for hosting some targetted working meetings in some of these areas, including the examples already given for some mini-summits. Some sponsors might help set up mini-summits (and some have in the psat), including considering the Linux Foundation as they do with the Desktop Architects Meeting (my favorite DAM meeting!). The challenge is to figure out what people want to have happen, the see if we can make it happen. gerrit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/