Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030273AbXBAE1Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:27:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751567AbXBAE1Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:27:16 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:38574 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751401AbXBAE1P (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:27:15 -0500 From: Len Brown Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:25:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Olivier Galibert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen References: <20070129204528.eb8d695e.akpm@osdl.org> <20070130090645.GC11823@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20070130012631.8bb86c76.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20070130012631.8bb86c76.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701312325.48781.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2507 Lines: 59 On Tuesday 30 January 2007 04:26, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:06:45 +0100 > Olivier Galibert wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:45:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > -x86_64-mm-share-whats-shareable.patch > > > -x86_64-mm-only-call-unreachable_devices-when-type-1-is-available.patch > > > -x86_64-mm-only-map-whats-necessary.patch > > > -x86_64-mm-detect-and-support-the-e7520-and-the-945g-gz-p-pl.patch > > > -x86_64-mm-reserve-resources-but-only-when-were-sure-about-them.patch > > > > Want me to update these? And maybe the other mmconfig related ones if > > I can find them. > > > > Thanks. That depends upon which of Andi or Len merges first. > > If Andi goes first, then Len has rather a bit of hackwork to do. > > If Len goes first then things are probably simpler, but that ACPI codedrop > is very new and might have problems. We wouldn't want to hold the x86 > merge back because of it. I think chances are actually quite good we'll be able to proceed with pushing the ACPI table re-write immediately upon 2.6.21 open. Note that while it is sort of big text-wise, it isn't that complicated -- and failures in this type of code tend to be massively obvious boot failures. Note also that 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 is not the maiden voyage to -mm for this code. It has been there several times before as it has matured. The table re-write broke the HP simulator -- but I think we can fix that quickly. I don't know yet what broke the HP rx2600. The sysfs branch is what broke the button and the Altix boot. Sysfs may or may not go upstream at 2.6.21 open -- but that isn't the code you are conflicting with here so that is moot. cheers, -Len > For now, I guess we sit back while Len and Andi sort out what they're going > to do. > > Len, what was in that merge anyway? Lots of renaming and shuffling things > around - the sorts of things which are safe as long as they compile OK. But > was there much substantive material in there as well? > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/