Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DEBC433FE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233320AbiAHCWe (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:22:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36046 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233306AbiAHCWc (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:22:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD20C06173E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id i8so7246767pgt.13 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:22:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=openresty-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=kGrdecSC3sPdHtWn9polPOvxxPNBR4DlkW3QJLsVlic=; b=KPgC6CipYjBN1/pAogCBoywf5xWdGJ/B9J1tE0Hjb5fDeS78+bRTKYKFp+dRTA50iR jO8NboZ1pDij5ZzWF1Bd/xLD8gjq3VCnc3rgCrlYet288M2HgQnc+N3crLRiaMjABrJ9 GkBSXOqYM8tqEIG0zIOr5Mc6CBrdse+Mp8jQ10jmIqqKBrO/CDmWYjPAIfIRciBdMAMs j44VKzPle4WaUYSt/LQcPDR5GZF6ZVyzVFs5U/gvy1macxEh/jf0mRblD/Nr0dSMtBa2 GkIKnNiSwbsZ/5wmDRnVM/hew30R1R9C/M7XRdzFVpFqBIS15pX4Uatv61K+MF2WHRqz h+xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=kGrdecSC3sPdHtWn9polPOvxxPNBR4DlkW3QJLsVlic=; b=h8Tk5cZdAwETQxoMugXn/Pfmx6vyAw20O2QIAtzD0ZxAQupFSYab5cEm8oWC80b+xl vgVvUvM35o5mogNJ62cPGb4Udg+ch1Q2XIMPDRNs/jyFgcBH7duMsqBpPAQ2sLv16l90 Grnc8VrkOjXpejACkYymsi7kKAbEGwgIMqo5m0Q+Wki4+9ZPma+Ttktw3n9DWN3lgYFg ZSZ5NYSH9g3aT7+Q8qtgek3OAvVrEIhoLtDxZ49aIrPkMjViS0Hj5LJJ83b/aA3d7bJM l9vMkQAb1Ke+bLmlFd7/0uz2HRKe7x99cvKdBYCKj1Te4pqYVK8IgZLwFx+AaNmouTtM Ydmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fcKCeFWY9BhhMVqtQ+EMAoqAb1+//ZkoKsOVJHU4X5oWZ+GN/ Vy48Uyg7a89kJyrW9Q1SPNqJPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCSy6VDT37VYN49wFdKlTjPScq9HkyQDn/tBoXW63qDWHpTqEY0bRELQJ9YMLrm9tBHwPbEw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:af1c:: with SMTP id w28mr54159096pge.372.1641608552345; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-98-35-249-89.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.35.249.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm169050pgt.93.2022.01.07.18.22.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:22:31 -0800 (PST) From: "Yichun Zhang (agentzh)" To: yichun@openresty.com Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH] bpf: btf: Fix a var size check in validator Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:22:12 -0800 Message-Id: <20220108022212.962-1-yichun@openresty.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The btf validator should croak when the variable size is larger than its type size, not less. The LLVM optimizer may use smaller sizes for the C type. We ran into this issue with real-world BPF programs emitted by the latest version of Clang/LLVM. Fixes: 1dc92851849cc ("bpf: kernel side support for BTF Var and DataSec") Signed-off-by: Yichun Zhang (agentzh) --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index 9bdb03767db5..2a6967b13ce1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -3696,7 +3696,7 @@ static int btf_datasec_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env, return -EINVAL; } - if (vsi->size < type_size) { + if (vsi->size > type_size) { btf_verifier_log_vsi(env, v->t, vsi, "Invalid size"); return -EINVAL; } -- 2.17.2