Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161190AbXBAFly (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 00:41:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161191AbXBAFly (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 00:41:54 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:44991 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161190AbXBAFlx (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 00:41:53 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,265,1167638400"; d="scan'208"; a="41803691:sNHT14393199303" User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:41:02 -0800 Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 LinuxKernel Summit From: Dirk Hohndel To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Gerrit Huizenga CC: , James Bottomley , , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 LinuxKernel Summit Thread-Index: AcdFuPF1K8N2t9etQAKHVw8Sk2d9UAACp1WY In-Reply-To: <45C126A3.8040005@zytor.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2007 05:41:48.0185 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA52F090:01C745C3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1691 Lines: 37 On 1/31/07 3:30 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > Gerrit Huizenga wrote: >> Don't confused KS with a conference; >> it is a workshop for a very, very large, very very active project. > > ... and *growing*, which is the real issue I think. > > Something that might make sense for KS is to have multiple sessions > (perhaps replacing some or all of the "mini-summits" that have cropped > up) combined with some bigger, overall sessions. At least that way > there would be more cross-pollination between the various groups than if > we eventually end up meeting everywhere. > > That's of course only practical if KS is separated from any other > conference (like OLS.) I have discussed this idea with a few people in the past. One could organize a set of interlocking / overlapping mini summits and end with a joint day for everyone. This would almost certainly create some idle time for almost every attendee - but obviously that can be filled by a hack fest or something. I don't think this could be organized for September (actually, I don't know how firm the contracts with the facilities are at this point), but certainly something we could plan for next year. One nice side-effect would be to allow for an overall larger group - you could have 30-40 people per "track" and maybe 100-120 total. Yes, this makes the conversation on the last day harder, but it would still stay productive and interactive for the most part. /D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/