Date:   Sun, 9 Jan 2022 09:59:55 +1300
From:   Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc:     gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, realwakka@gmail.com,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: pi433: move get version func to where all
 other functions are
Message-ID: <20220108205955.GA3660@mail.google.com>
References: <20220106201430.GA3416@mail.google.com>
 <20220106213325.GA10767@mail.google.com>
 <20220107085343.GP7674@kadam>
 <20220107192438.GB2693@mail.google.com>
 <20220108111910.GA1978@kadam>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220108111910.GA1978@kadam>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:19:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > are you strongly set on the rf69_read_reg approach or would you
> > be open to keep the original approach? (rf69_get_version)
> 
> I think my approach is best but I don't care.

Thanks for being so flexible. I'll keep your suggestion at the back of my
head and if I come across more scenarios in which rf69_read_reg would
be the easiest way, I will gladly send a different patch to make it
reality.

> > I just want to double-check if this suggestion is taking into
> > consideration what was mentioned here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220106210134.GB3416@mail.google.com/ 
> > 
> > If it is, I'm happy to add it back but I just wanted to confirm it
> > first.
> 
> Yes.  Keep the error handling.  Your way makes the code more complicated
> to read.
>

Agreed. I will add it back.

thanks,

Paulo A.