Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E0FC433EF for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 19:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236654AbiAITUP (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:20:15 -0500 Received: from esa2.mentor.iphmx.com ([68.232.141.98]:58058 "EHLO esa2.mentor.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236466AbiAITUO (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:20:14 -0500 IronPort-SDR: hDTJqrzfglK+zEAByceUvgDPK7IiswBEtRQk3V/AJf96BLVF7fvimGlpNji5tXxdR8hW5S57Mt xqSMK2K0KR96IxNIaVFFJRUrwtQvcXAwU6rophxqXzY6UZt3bjJsiIU29zKkM8hDetsuUnVYzG MSfgfkhAfs9sF9eGGNZ3cwyLnpc2+lOJA1owySO+0mpgkFPrK5guElg1jGTjDVV7iNRWdakTuN xchuoB0EQrko20ajR3qtcj1lhrF9xz3Gvy7PX22Q0CdBh9BHLdrQRj47elDrhAzpccc9LMBumA PSuWVWUCy4Phph30bU98j5Ki X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,274,1635235200"; d="scan'208";a="70542448" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa2.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2022 11:20:13 -0800 IronPort-SDR: HaHO8aJ1UHMYc39MNK4ycmWbuadsLMSCkyg/q04bL6ZQKChwz3qh6LyJCxM9/OL05iFBA0XlX2 wUH+JyxNN+fzCBjG4uqXA1e8mK/B1ecKnUuJKE+iD+oGJ+VW3fu6TfOIQA8D2fvoft+Sax75Pq RYrxxtHuxIOePbU2YRaDhvNbXkKw8IJ35K5KnWhJoqXKTUcfD4wtlWv5Qyjprxtsx6QqkR0w5B JK7oZB8xhylYPpU1i5XOC/xTuuV7KGunVzlechvaYH1+AHBJ0pqDgZpeM0g6X2olSg9MQQAagv c+M= From: Andrew Gabbasov To: 'Geert Uytterhoeven' CC: 'Linux-Renesas' , 'Linux I2C' , 'Linux Kernel Mailing List' , 'Wolfram Sang' , "Surachari, Bhuvanesh" References: <20210922160649.28449-1-andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:20:01 +0300 Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation Message-ID: <000001d8058d$eb130710$c1391530$@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQHXue1eCQdNXjaiK021FrevUeTu7qvGRbCQgEMVGxCAUkv+EA== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-09.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.9) To svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.2) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Geert, Wolfram, Could you please let me know your opinion on version 2 of this patch, that addressed your earlier review comments? https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211006182314.10585-1-andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com/ Does it still need any further modifications or are you going to promote it further upstream? Thanks. Best regards, Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Gabbasov > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 1:35 PM > To: 'Geert Uytterhoeven' > Cc: 'Linux-Renesas' ; 'Linux I2C' ; 'Linux Kernel > Mailing List' ; 'Wolfram Sang' ; Surachari, > Bhuvanesh > Subject: RE: [PATCH] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support > > Hello Geert, Wolfram, > > Do you have any feedback on version 2 of this patch, that was submitted > after your review comments below? > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211006182314.10585-1-andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com/ > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Andrew > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Gabbasov > > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2021 9:12 PM > > To: 'Geert Uytterhoeven' > > Cc: Linux-Renesas ; Linux I2C ; Linux Kernel > > Mailing List ; Wolfram Sang ; Surachari, > > Bhuvanesh > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support > > > > Hi Geert, > > > > Thank you for your review! > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2021 4:32 PM > > > To: Gabbasov, Andrew > > > Cc: Linux-Renesas ; Linux I2C ; Linux Kernel > > > Mailing List ; Wolfram Sang ; Surachari, > > > Bhuvanesh > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:14 PM Andrew Gabbasov > > > wrote: > > > > The smbus block read is not currently supported for rcar i2c devices. > > > > This patchset adds the support to rcar i2c bus so that blocks of data > > > > can be read using SMbus block reads.(using i2c_smbus_read_block_data() > > > > function from the i2c-core-smbus.c). > > > > > > > > Inspired by commit 8e8782c71595 ("i2c: imx: add SMBus block read support") > > > > > > > > This patch (adapted) was tested with v4.14, but due to lack of real > > > > hardware with SMBus block read operations support, using "simulation", > > > > that is manual analysis of data, read from plain I2C devices with > > > > SMBus block read request. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhuvanesh Surachari > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Gabbasov > > > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c > > > > @@ -429,9 +431,16 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_dma(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv) > > > > /* > > > > * The last two bytes needs to be fetched using PIO in > > > > * order for the STOP phase to work. > > > > + * > > > > + * For SMBus block read the first byte was received using PIO. > > > > > > So it might be easier to read, and more maintainable, to keep the > > > old assignments: > > > > > > buf = priv->msg->buf; > > > len = priv->msg->len - 2; > > > > > > and adjust them for SMBus afterwards: > > > > > > if (block_data) { > > > /* For SMBus block read the first byte was received using PIO */ > > > buf++; > > > len--; > > > } > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > */ > > > > - buf = priv->msg->buf; > > > > - len = priv->msg->len - 2; > > > > + if (block_data) { > > > > + buf = priv->msg->buf + 1; > > > > + len = priv->msg->len - 3; > > > > + } else { > > > > + buf = priv->msg->buf; > > > > + len = priv->msg->len - 2; > > > > + } > > > > } else { > > > > /* > > > > * First byte in message was sent using PIO. > > > > > > And below we have another case handling buf and len :-( > > > > > > So perhaps: > > > > > > buf = priv->msg->buf; > > > len = priv->msg->len; > > > > > > if (read) { > > > /* > > > * The last two bytes needs to be fetched using PIO in > > > * order for the STOP phase to work. > > > */ > > > len -= 2; > > > } > > > if (!read || block_data) { > > > /* First byte in message was sent using PIO * > > > buf++; > > > len--; > > > } > > > > Probably I was trying to minimize the changes ;-) > > > > However, I agree with you that the whole code fragment can be simplified > > and your variant indeed looks more clean and understandable. > > Thank you for your suggestion, I'll submit version 2 of the patch > > with this fragment changed. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Best regards, > > Andrew