MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210715221828.244536-1-Terry.Bowman@amd.com> <20210907183720.6e0be6b6@endymion>
 <20211105170550.746443b9@endymion> <33a0cd08-a336-34b3-d36c-f827b8054e9e@amd.com>
 <c28ab909-99b4-b43c-e330-b07e35afb981@amd.com> <ebee1239-4ed4-8c68-54e0-f684cea71e93@roeck-us.net>
 <YdoG+en5Z/MaS/wu@ninjato>
In-Reply-To: <YdoG+en5Z/MaS/wu@ninjato>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:29:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfC2XsF2j=obXu7RLNZkKSsZ20eOH2-UMA9AoMAemKa9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: piix4: Replace piix4_smbus driver's cd6h/cd7h port
 io accesses with mmio accesses
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Terry.Bowman@amd.com, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:25 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > I think you'll need approval from someone with authority to accept the
> > suggested change in include/linux/ioport.h. No idea who that would be.
>
> ioport.h has no dedicated maintainer. I would modify it via my tree if
> we have enough review. I'd think Guenter, me, and maybe Andy
> (Shevchenko), and Rafael should be a good crowd. So, I suggest to do
> your v2 and add all these people to CC. It is usually easier to talk
> about existing code.

I have briefly read the discussion by the link you provided above in
this thread. I'm not sure I understand the issue and if Intel hardware
is affected. Is there any summary of the problem?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko