Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:12:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:11:54 -0500 Received: from ns01.netrox.net ([64.118.231.130]:11705 "EHLO smtp01.netrox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:11:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile warnings in 2.4.15pre9 From: Robert Love To: Andreas Dilger Cc: Rich Baum , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011122165454.P1308@lynx.no> In-Reply-To: <132A4694022@coral.indstate.edu> <20011122165454.P1308@lynx.no> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.1+cvs.2001.11.14.08.58 (Preview Release) Date: 22 Nov 2001 19:03:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1006473785.1336.6.camel@icbm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 18:54, Andreas Dilger wrote: > How about something like (not real patches, but you get the idea: > > @@ -4691,6 +4691,7 @@ > OUTL_DSP (SCRIPTA_BA (np, clrack)); > +out_stuck: > return; > -out_stuck: > } > > @@ -5226,6 +5227,7 @@ > > +fail: > return; > -fail: > } Yes, much better. Besides looking better, gcc _may_ generate different code (I don't know how smart it is in this case) that has these "fall throughs" and that would mean (a) less code and (b) less jumps -- always a win. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/