Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422794AbXBAR5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:57:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422842AbXBAR5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:57:25 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:42759 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422794AbXBAR5Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:57:24 -0500 Subject: Re: crash on CONFIG_CFAG12864B=y in 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 From: Daniel Walker To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <653402b90702010939t692e0852pc6750dbfae4b25f5@mail.gmail.com> References: <1168188931.26086.255.camel@imap.mvista.com> <653402b90702010549v17e72765uc718c1ae79419003@mail.gmail.com> <653402b90702010716i7c0ddf71xe6fa7866323f52f4@mail.gmail.com> <1170342991.9781.189.camel@imap.mvista.com> <653402b90702010913g3d91b190ud4faa2bcce3251b@mail.gmail.com> <1170350433.9781.200.camel@imap.mvista.com> <653402b90702010939t692e0852pc6750dbfae4b25f5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:55:52 -0800 Message-Id: <1170352552.9781.212.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2093 Lines: 50 On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:39 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On 2/1/07, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:13 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I use the word "module" for both cases: When I modprobe > > > cfag12864b, if ks0108 fails, it doesn't get linked. So I thought the > > > same happen for built-in drivers (in other words, I didn't think > > > cfag12864b would be linked if ks0108 failed). > > > > > > So I'm waiting until someone tell me what is the right way to avoid > > > drivers like cfag12864b been inited if their dependencies failed. > > > > > > Anyway, thanks for discovering the bug (I wouldn't have discovered it > > > as my motherboard has parallel port ;). > > > > I have a parallel port, but I don't have the cfag12864b or ks0108 .. I > > In fact, you don't need the cfag12864b display, as the driver just > needs the parallel port for output (you can put some LEDs attached to > the parallel port to check the driver's operations and it will be > fine). > > BTW, why ks0108 didn't find the 888 parallel port? Haven't you got such number? You know I think your right, it may not have a parallel port.. It's so common I tend to take it for granted . > > think the simplest way to fix it would be to add a flag to ks0108 that > > signals successful initialization , then force cfag12864b to check for > > that .. > > Sure, that won't be a problem; however, maybe there is other better way (?). When you build the driver as a module the module loader will only load what is needed, and in order .. When the same driver is built-in the module_init() becomes a device_initcall() , and all device_initcall's get executed .. So you have to expect that cfag12864b drivers initcalls will run eventually and will need to be careful about it's initialization. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/