Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422929AbXBASml (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:42:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422933AbXBASml (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:42:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:54997 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422929AbXBASmk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:42:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:42:17 -0800 From: Judith Lebzelter To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" , Judith Lebzelter , ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@osdl.org Subject: Re: [ PATCH ] fix to documentation for kexec Message-ID: <20070201184217.GF5825@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20070201181955.GE5825@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1821 Lines: 46 On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Feb 1 2007 13:30, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> >@@ -228,8 +228,8 @@ Notes on loading the dump-capture kernel > >> > * You must specify in the format corresponding to the root > >> > device name in the output of mount command. > >> > > >> >-* "init 1" boots the dump-capture kernel into single-user mode without > >> >- networking. If you want networking, use "init 3." > >> >+* Boot parameter "1" boots the dump-capture kernel into single-user mode > >> >+ without networking. If you want networking, use "3". > >> > >> Yup. More precisely, any arguments that could not be parsed (because > >> the kernel does not know them) are handed down to the init program > >> as arguments and/or environment variables. > > > >whoops, ignore my last post, i misread the critical words. > > However, I am not sure how the kernel will handle this. Especially since: > > * if you boot with no initramfs, init= is handled by your script > (otherwise: kernel) > > * does "init" qualify as a kernel param already? I don't think so, > since the code indicates to be wanting "init=" at least. > > Either way, the word "init" in the above doc is either (1) wrong > or (2) superfluous [unless something strange happens to interpret it later, > which I don't think] Yes, it looks like "init=" is right, "init" is wrong. I did notice that my patch is out of date for the latest kernel, however. I can send an up to date one. Judith > > > Jan > -- > ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/