Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423015AbXBAVHJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:07:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423016AbXBAVHJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:07:09 -0500 Received: from dvhart.com ([64.146.134.43]:39341 "EHLO dvhart.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423015AbXBAVHH (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:07:07 -0500 Message-ID: <45C25628.9060100@mbligh.org> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:05:44 -0800 From: mbligh User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen Cc: jbohac@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik , ssouhlal@freebsd.org, arjan@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, johnstul@us.ibm.com, zippel@linux-m68k.org, andrea@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] Remove the TSC synchronization on SMP machines References: <20070201095952.589234000@jet.suse.cz> <20070201103753.753349000@jet.suse.cz> <200702011214.24126.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200702011214.24126.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 18 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 01 February 2007 10:59, jbohac@suse.cz wrote: >> TSC is either synchronized by design or not reliable >> to be used for anything, let alone timekeeping. > > In my tree this is already done better by a patch from Ingo. > Check if they look synchronized and don't use TSC if they are not. Is it going to notice dynamically when one cpu ramps down/up during runtime, and looses sync? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/