Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2E7C433F5 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239558AbiAKMjY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:39:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59270 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239548AbiAKMjX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:39:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60078C06173F; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id h10so22556160wrb.1; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:39:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7Hrhm7bAUxgue0b8cX7wTHTiwkPBIXA/e8ccgbg0Dw8=; b=bDWLB0Zhkj2AneVRgl6tB5bQ5Mo7kVC1W3ODKTD2An//sMJ4wo1A3bLmVzwOQD4H8L kFxtzoUuH8FMlnJl3+GuFZV5dtz9yOX9jZB1Db42sKDuJ4ZiX1P6cp3hJzOJona9KNIa eA6Kxm9SL64D6BZZntPFBTSJmeuoImKDzMEEUKNrKCb0VBA9QdmZ5XgNsKYkMbWGrcqH Q5PS/ED/jyQT+KEsTI3uqclu5KjM0pZRDbEa4sGFXJ7622BUQ8ADqNA8Tx85X1wUQZss 17lKB+uXB5A3VBC0kjHdiog06F0v7Ocw9mvzQajpQETOTMuXC42S/PO0AtoABNFbZ/nU AlKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7Hrhm7bAUxgue0b8cX7wTHTiwkPBIXA/e8ccgbg0Dw8=; b=oFRJ301kMHwsCwqwefMm0XBUxtR+hUFGfKZj838ym1360/lj/BG/K5kyWDkNrjactc V7k1e115oAXQHM5SMEm3Dbp8M49IOkHrBKf/jqFtGe9DAyHuSWVS+rfhPEtcmDD7u3ty Ua8dFv1SdoZOn4j8D+JDAM2MLDVwPKOFXdMpEIiJ9OY0SUvgUfpZYGGDrtXZSZPfuaho p76oXQ6wlJKpREQ1zEL0NMbbgtb2JDPr5Dhr7fYTW/jlrAgp+6aBaQS6U4y3uDlbp1h1 tqGwl8qB7AbM+p+mVvCQouBt4HItknjWSOtQqWpwVBfAwSAZSZb+EiLTq5S7a6JwMkHu QFXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ES1Sd5ygDJs3w+lC4izrYg9NEs/aOanxrD8LEHGaNB1vqV4Fi MFq1syp+Wf7g/F3HxibLocE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjUhdhLpbBw5ZjJX+BV8NzyPCzziYyAYczHWuWxu6XApYItCICXKxUIAZlwCzUWi8rQzTT0A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4047:: with SMTP id w7mr3617686wrp.519.1641904762032; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:39:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm9246124wrr.88.2022.01.11.04.39.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:39:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:39:19 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/34] 5.4.171-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220110071815.647309738@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220110071815.647309738@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 08:22:55AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.171 release. > There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Jan 2022 07:18:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/610 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip