Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 16:48:26 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To:     "lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Cc:     "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
        "zyjzyj2000@gmail.com" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
        "aharonl@nvidia.com" <aharonl@nvidia.com>,
        "leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "mbloch@nvidia.com" <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
        "liangwenpeng@huawei.com" <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>,
        "yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
        "rpearsonhpe@gmail.com" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
        "y-goto@fujitsu.com" <y-goto@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 08/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush execution
 in responder side
Message-ID: <20220111204826.GK6467@ziepe.ca>
References: <20211228080717.10666-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <20211228080717.10666-9-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <20220106002804.GS6467@ziepe.ca>
 <347eb51d-6b0c-75fb-e27f-6bf4969125fe@fujitsu.com>
 <20220106173346.GU6467@ziepe.ca>
 <daa77a81-a518-0ba1-650c-faaaef33c1ea@fujitsu.com>
 <20220110143419.GF6467@ziepe.ca>
 <56234596-cb7d-bdb2-fcfd-f1fe0f25c3e3@fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56234596-cb7d-bdb2-fcfd-f1fe0f25c3e3@fujitsu.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:34:36AM +0000, lizhijian@fujitsu.com wrote:

> Yes, that's true. that's because only pmem has ability to persist data.
> So do you mean we don't need to prevent user to create/register a persistent
> access flag to a non-pmem MR? it would be a bit confusing if so.

Since these extensions seem to have a mode that is unrelated to
persistent memory, I'm not sure it makes sense to link the two things.

Jason