Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1368AC433FE for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 02:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348345AbiALCSX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:18:23 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]:35454 "EHLO mail-oo1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236083AbiALCSW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:18:22 -0500 Received: by mail-oo1-f47.google.com with SMTP id q15-20020a4a6c0f000000b002dc415427d3so258304ooc.2; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:18:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BO8Ck/GGtQHl3h6eStim8WA1eqAvMlyV0nmG424orR4=; b=kePL2SCJkQF/Z4trVtpT8tnWTjiiQMCt+D0aJ5j4sMMEzW73Azgh4RY0S1geEhqSyh kuJLQZGPuXTPI2wZhYSsyQRIfb0s90D7O4VPkoYYU3BxbqjdscD9YVJSuV/QLU9iD6NT X+JzvwjgJHryIBjWIBWkqTGHAun/qC5SMAvT+P6NvxSmz3STGwZybO7MkkQmPQxtSOdi qgh889xmrgs6D4ObvaUrEtFevUXtBQ85IRlR+xj9rUe/vyeRkdehWnwpDSWNZGc8fYKJ RATXqr1WZuPvSBmh0oamWtOkPITyybiP41IdHbT2r1u+1c1JTFi4LIuqfuVyjF7+VaZ5 YFkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306wY0LdnLQONd0VUXdn5ZFT5a7LgFnkeowGoFNsa7ZIKRtGPpJ clr/xbmbRTq5ZTn23m3Vx/Ynkcs4lQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpfe+rU+Xszas4yAs90JejNxO5tFbDzjU5Jmj+x0bVLjCaBSYH2hZ8uOd/leZ6ggwmU+nP0w== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d248:: with SMTP id e8mr4922072oos.5.1641953901346; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w14sm2289381oou.24.2022.01.11.18.18.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 3939569 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 02:18:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 20:18:19 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Sander Vanheule Cc: Sebastian Reichel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority Message-ID: References: <20220110214456.67087-1-sander@svanheule.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220110214456.67087-1-sander@svanheule.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:44:56 +0100, Sander Vanheule wrote: > Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority > slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update > the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have > the same default value. > > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule > --- > This is a resubmission of RFC: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/ > > The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for > rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts: > rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart > node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively > rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case). > > Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the > documentation. > > An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards > may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about > out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of > gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716) > DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the > changed default. > > arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc) > The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use > gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no > other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could > be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code. > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f) > Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart > handlers. > > Best, > Sander > > .../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring