Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A02DC433EF for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350463AbiALIcT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 03:32:19 -0500 Received: from smtp25.cstnet.cn ([159.226.251.25]:59394 "EHLO cstnet.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238074AbiALIcR (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 03:32:17 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [124.16.138.126]) by APP-05 (Coremail) with SMTP id zQCowADHzQH9kd5hTlcSBg--.19832S2; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:31:57 +0800 (CST) From: Jiasheng Jiang To: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang Subject: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Check for error num after setting mask Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:31:56 +0800 Message-Id: <20220112083156.1124782-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: zQCowADHzQH9kd5hTlcSBg--.19832S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uw4UJr1ktFWxCF1rJFWxtFb_yoW8Wr17pa 1rWFyFkrWfJr1ru39av3WUZFyYqw1ktFWrt3y7Wan2v343JryjqFyxAFyjvF1kJFyrtw1f XFWjyr1ru3y8J3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkm14x267AKxVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r4j6ryUM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j 6F4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwCY02Avz4vE14v_GFyl 42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJV WUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAK I48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r 4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI 42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUepBTUUUUU X-Originating-IP: [124.16.138.126] X-CM-SenderInfo: pmld2xxhqjqxpvfd2hldfou0/ Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Because of the possible failure of the dma_supported(), the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() may return error num. Therefore, it should be better to check it and return the error if fails. And since the sdhci_setup_host() has already checked the return value of the enable_dma, we need not check it in sdhci_resume_host() again. Fixes: 5552d7ad596c ("mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set proper dma mask for ls104x chips") Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang --- Changelog v1 -> v2 * Change 1. Remove the change of esdhc_of_resume and refine the commit * message. --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c index a593b1fbd69e..0f3658b36513 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c @@ -524,12 +524,16 @@ static void esdhc_of_adma_workaround(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask) static int esdhc_of_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host) { + int ret; u32 value; struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc); if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc") || - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) - dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) { + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); + if (ret) + return ret; + } value = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL); -- 2.25.1