Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A176CC433F5 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355900AbiALR75 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:59:57 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]:48894 "EHLO dfw.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1355892AbiALR7s (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:59:48 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E636198C; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8929C36AEA; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642010388; bh=Ls0HyapqDP6RLzagqMq2iLuycV6FXBNd3QfxH8Y1j9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ACbzwXvIvbiRUMp3ICEq7LzZIy77X90vAF/EBkkFvJmt3FI5zxRHWrSl5BaNatEtA PvEwPsUJeyiQzN39VVXOHqvvPiptTnqxYy92kXJjZlUlrGpNT7G4qQF45BsJyLYNWW p8V5YIhL+ae4y4nG3a9WiKSDjJB8r/W+pIxMpjQLKdy75T2WFMhT9M25TQ4tdsTa48 Z1Jf6rRkhpQN2kHn5kkWPvNyV4mdBzt5a9Dxkd3HwR1pIt/lmd4p8cwDnrk6vNqDXC c6RDwO3A9GQb19COqRSxYovi8vhKIBu4w7UrHl+adq2EwUiUD/ysuEeY5Qjg8pEoiP PU/QIP3fwFXCw== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58A1640714; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:59:46 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:59:46 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: John Garry Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Jin Yao , "Paul A . Clarke" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Workload test of metric and metricgroups Message-ID: References: <20210917184240.2181186-1-irogers@google.com> <158a1451-9d69-d67d-3fad-9e947112f9e6@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:32:56PM +0000, John Garry escreveu: > On 12/01/2022 13:34, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > v3. Fix test condition (thanks to Paul A. Clarke). Add a > > > > > fallback case of a larger workload so that we don't ignore " > > > > counted>". > > > > > v2. Switched the workload to something faster. > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > I just noticed that this test fails on my broadwell machine. > > > > > > I am using acme perf/core @ 09dd3c22daaf > > Hi, > > > > Can you try with tmp.perf/perf_cpu instead? > > > > There's a patch there that maybe fixes this. > > Yeah, that (metricgroups) test passes on that branch. I assume it's the test > script -a change... Can I get that as a Tested-by: you tag? - Arnaldo