MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210719082756.15733-1-ms@dev.tdt.de> <CAJ+vNU3_8Gk8Mj_uCudMz0=MdN3B9T9pUOvYtP7H_B0fnTfZmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <94120968908a8ab073fa2fc0dd56b17d@dev.tdt.de> <CAJ+vNU2Bn_eks03g191KKLx5uuuekdqovx000aqcT5=f_6Zq=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yd7bsbvLyIquY5jn@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Yd7bsbvLyIquY5jn@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
From:   Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:25:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJ+vNU1R8fGssHjfoz-jN1zjBLPz4Kg8XEUsy4z4bByKS1PqQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: phy: intel-xway: Add RGMII internal
 delay configuration
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
        martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, kuba@kernel.org,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 5:46 AM Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:12:33AM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> > I added a debug statement in xway_gphy_rgmii_init and here you can see
> > it gets called 'before' the link comes up from the NIC on a board that
> > has a cable plugged in at power-on. I can tell from testing that the
> > rx_delay/tx_delay set in xway_gphy_rgmii_init does not actually take
> > effect unless I then bring the link down and up again manually as you
> > indicate.
> >
> > # dmesg | egrep "xway|nicvf"
> > [    6.855971] xway_gphy_rgmii_init mdio_thunder MDI_MIICTRL:0xb100
> > rx_delay=1500 tx_delay=500
> > [    6.999651] nicvf, ver 1.0
> > [    7.002478] nicvf 0000:05:00.1: Adding to iommu group 7
> > [    7.007785] nicvf 0000:05:00.1: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    7.053189] nicvf 0000:05:00.2: Adding to iommu group 8
> > [    7.058511] nicvf 0000:05:00.2: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [   11.044616] nicvf 0000:05:00.2 eth1: Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full duplex
>
> Does the kernel message about the link coming up reflect what is going
> on physically with the link though?
>
> If a network interface is down, it's entirely possible that the link is
> already established at the hardware level, buit the "Link is Up" message
> gets reported when the network interface is later brought up. So,
> debugging this by looking at the kernel messages is unreliable.
>

Russell,

You are correct... the link doesn't come up at that point its already
linked. So we need to force a reset or an auto negotiation reset after
modifying the delays.

Tim