Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BECFC433FE for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235576AbiAMOIV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:08:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229611AbiAMOIT (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:08:19 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8FCC06173F; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB00B82244; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78CE6C36AE9; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:08:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642082896; bh=AGXrB6RyRlJGlxXBTGJ56tVcl5sCtnIbd+sOvFKcyCs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=JacG3I6VacRn9ssc1DqBNDh/6vt2laJIPLsgwmfG+tz5afXRM5WWshvos8zBoShl1 nCBUJVi5AqhbRox0EAJN5UKOlRPptcJVL/hD0rOW1U3Qrjfem6qu/aFpy9SsB9exK6 OfQ11o89t5mB9ZeZihirdKjIikuC9GwFt0cEOLd5y8mGVt27pN8XyX1tNxgBblmnXQ XpKzTNVgF34QoCzwoaw11xD3kv3RXe/1CNh7of3vy99PexXY1SsW6BkW7j5CbOjBZf 8nGABQIeFJUGyIRHULR/AM4PaqHlqWtUX605+Pv5LJZlf/m/S8KzGdfa7TT8qg8N+a QODIDMMi48Uvg== Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 30so23543712edv.3; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:08:16 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328Ndem5EHAsstTKa8lVRXzkpMGKN0rwEgQ6Ev/AriVjaCFBsIq x/Rg/YAfwVFjebLK7kMDfq+YXoZBhjvG9khO8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+GHMwRV43sdBzHOeq12c86XZ9NFpJ+TiS7boAD3AIss0eauOXeqU8D6mHwfFBb9xoSuThXxy1UPREBNztaR4= X-Received: by 2002:a50:cf4e:: with SMTP id d14mr4349160edk.2.1642082894743; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:08:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220110214456.67087-1-sander@svanheule.net> <71fffde0704d240f5ec8773fe0e738b6e069a6b8.camel@svanheule.net> In-Reply-To: <71fffde0704d240f5ec8773fe0e738b6e069a6b8.camel@svanheule.net> From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:08:03 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority To: Sander Vanheule Cc: Sebastian Reichel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:THERMAL" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:49 PM Sander Vanheule wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 20:18 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:44:56 +0100, Sander Vanheule wrote: > > > Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority > > > slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update > > > the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have > > > the same default value. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule > > > --- > > > This is a resubmission of RFC: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/ > > > > > > The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for > > > rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts: > > > rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart > > > node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively > > > rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case). > > > > > > Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the > > > documentation. > > > > > > An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards > > > may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about > > > out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of > > > gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority: > > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716) > > > DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the > > > changed default. > > > > > > arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc) > > > The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use > > > gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no > > > other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could > > > be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code. > > > > > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f) > > > Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart > > > handlers. > > > > > > Best, > > > Sander > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > Thanks for the review! > > I've noticed the devicetree patchwork has this patch marked as "Not applicable", but > linux-pm patchwork has it marked "Handled elsewhere". Since you merged the gpio-restart > conversion patch, can you also take this one, Rob? Yes, I'll pick it up. Rob