Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1AAC433F5 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237646AbiAMSrw (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:47:52 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:37840 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237622AbiAMSrv (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:47:51 -0500 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-108-7-220-252.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.7.220.252]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 20DIlYOX017627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:47:35 -0500 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 2108115C40F6; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:47:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:47:34 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: X86 ML , Arnd Bergmann , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove a.out support Message-ID: References: <20220113160115.5375-1-bp@alien8.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220113160115.5375-1-bp@alien8.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov > > Commit > > eac616557050 ("x86: Deprecate a.out support") > > deprecated a.out support with the promise to remove it a couple of > releases later. That commit landed in v5.1. > > Now it is more than a couple of releases later, no one has complained so > remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Let's pour one out for being able to run Minix binaries on Linux. :-) Speaking of which, if we're doing this, are there some old system calls that we could remove at the same time? - Ted