Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946203AbXBCC2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:28:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946229AbXBCC2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:28:30 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:55174 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946203AbXBCC23 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:28:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:15:52 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Eric Van Hensbergen , Trond Myklebust , Neil Brown , Stephen Hemminger , Frederic Riss , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Andi Kleen , "Eric W. Biederman" , Francois Romieu Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions Message-Id: <20070202181552.ac588b27.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <45C3ED84.6010506@garzik.org> References: <20070202054916.GA3754@stusta.de> <20070202175504.a3bab5ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45C3ED84.6010506@garzik.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2129 Lines: 56 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:03:48 -0500 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:16 +0100 > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19 > >> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > > > There are still a few things hanging around. > > > > I have these queued: > > > > aio-fix-buggy-put_ioctx-call-in-aio_complete-v2.patch > > kexec-avoid-migration-of-already-disabled-irqs-ia64.patch > > net-smc911x-match-up-spin-lock-unlock.patch > > rtc-pcf8563-detect-polarity-of-century-bit-automatically.patch > > alpha-fix-epoll-syscall-enumerations.patch > > revert-blockdev-direct-io-back-to-2619-version.patch > > scsi-sd-udev-accessing-an-uninitialized-scsi_disk-results-in-a-crash.patch > > altix-more-acpi-prt-support.patch > > Would you forward the x86-64 dma_noncoherent API build fix I posted? > Anything that uses that API won't build on x86-64 without my [simple and > obvious] patch. Yup. That's this: --- a/include/asm-x86_64/dma-mapping.h~x86-64-define-dma-noncoherent-api-functions +++ a/include/asm-x86_64/dma-mapping.h @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static inline int dma_mapping_error(dma_ return (dma_addr == bad_dma_address); } +#define dma_alloc_noncoherent(d, s, h, f) dma_alloc_coherent(d, s, h, f) +#define dma_free_noncoherent(d, s, v, h) dma_free_coherent(d, s, v, h) + extern void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp); extern void dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *vaddr, _ > > > - I have r8169-fix-a-race-between-pci-probe-and-dev_open.patch floating > > about, but I forget its status. > > I posted a preferred patch (which someone then noted need to use > setup_timer), and am waiting for an "it works" response of some sort OK, thanks, I'll drop it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/