Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp2693476pxb; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:00:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyS0ViZ5oyr7kdMqFSMKwV1CnqKgGRCXtKoDScX+TJnuaeYHkEf/jvp2E6up/OLmewPcMHZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:41cf:b0:14a:5f35:52d4 with SMTP id u15-20020a17090341cf00b0014a5f3552d4mr22505046ple.14.1642420848985; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:00:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1642420848; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xBEUL9gJ8JPgTGF+0cqBc4fgj9WR8dbM14RdMq+wSP0TmbSWVn1t99QH85IGQHvwl4 zwEEoL5AEtCuAZ6ICuFtqymrc4HUJX0a/zwYxcL0KrLq+W7VMS+b/Uu8S7KbSXU71Oq5 2m63xy7glgAWRvYqVF8tzscSXf840O0LLDM/7/cqx1BMphCTCY0jKL20iJMqDntEZ3KR hOgRP3PYesllZqqx9Gwm9Knl5NWyjpECYrH1NHKsFJdhI2x16Z6Vu+eHFvMhTPOBpDiz Xx5BP3qf10t/rOGib8uSC2xISvECN8WMaJYRFZmkr4GBak/sILJ8BF1g16gn0p54k30z /ZJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=E0hzWZjbnj2e/MTX84xqmFd7+XKjX6vNePf8cxaitOM=; b=TzcHa4YOlCH5wWWHFjXUvxmj/+HVyo22JldVp9q1SIpphwC2MZseDiltAyt7BD4hCe wu1T/ewEbwSX8/veQBKDuK+a3+Aa83mG9CVxxr2HjMJrQ++OgRCYHiwIwKZzCQ1LugWs /eyvuAk8Nb8zaVPyOkY6iZ7/QBKNWRrvh4BeN1hZWjBb4noXWu2yl3MfxR+4b5DywfO0 0wAXH9Gf/HmyhZnWuP9CCf/EOy774eqPmAftJUYHOBL483uFdhz0W2VzHHLL1fkDfJb8 3rlC20XtWCJSZezh1EmVklkxJrj//lZWniZ2Ku/HVyLO/m0XLxgovTuhG2udLYSZlf1d 4TWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q20si15212452pfu.171.2022.01.17.04.00.36; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:00:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236999AbiAQED5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 16 Jan 2022 23:03:57 -0500 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]:45760 "EHLO sin.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234174AbiAQEDy (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2022 23:03:54 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD85CE0B80 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6525FC36AE3; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] m68k/kernel: array out of bound access in process_uboot_commandline To: Hangyu Hua , geert@linux-m68k.org Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220113015854.9326-1-hbh25y@gmail.com> From: Greg Ungerer Message-ID: <95d91f5f-c5e1-0750-ebb9-b6839aecdc7c@linux-m68k.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:03:45 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220113015854.9326-1-hbh25y@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hangyu, On 13/1/22 11:58 am, Hangyu Hua wrote: > When the size of commandp >= size, array out of bound write occurs because > len == 0. > > Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua > --- > arch/m68k/kernel/uboot.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/uboot.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/uboot.c > index 928dbd33fc4a..63eaf3c3ddcd 100644 > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/uboot.c > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/uboot.c > @@ -101,5 +101,6 @@ __init void process_uboot_commandline(char *commandp, int size) > } > > parse_uboot_commandline(commandp, len); > - commandp[len - 1] = 0; > + if (len > 0) > + commandp[len - 1] = 0; > } > I am not convinced this is wrong for the reason you think it is. Looking at the code in its entirety: __init void process_uboot_commandline(char *commandp, int size) { int len, n; n = strnlen(commandp, size); commandp += n; len = size - n; if (len) { /* Add the whitespace separator */ *commandp++ = ' '; len--; } parse_uboot_commandline(commandp, len); commandp[len - 1] = 0; } "commandp" is moved based on the return of the strnlen(). So in the case of commandp actually being full of valid characters (so n == size, and thus len == 0) the commandp technically points outside of its real size at that point. But "command[[len - 1]" would actually be pointing to the last char in the original commandp array (so the original commandp[size - 1]). Well at least if you are happy with the use of negative array indexes. Clearly this could be structured better. There is no point in calling parse_uboot_commandline() if len == 0, or even if len == 1, since you cannot add anymore to the command line, it is full. Regards Greg