Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHmME9ofzanQTBD_WYBRW49d+gM77rCdh8Utdk4+PM9n_bmKwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72=hXXvzfYz-1EdgDNBVfYMiRp2RbjjNF=wwiiPVU+jmuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <3cbaf145ee577f017cf7aea953c9dd1eb88ed4b4.camel@perches.com>
 <CANiq72=bfYHM6XjQZ9dG_auahA_w59naEXM+VZHGm0m=_7nOqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9pWGsc5wLzNK5pe4gVLPNb4uUWYF8AARK8_K=WYLwdGfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHmME9p6q5MxLy-_1KaDWz8ksQYAUev1UvaQ-fHhetmy0sNHOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9p6q5MxLy-_1KaDWz8ksQYAUev1UvaQ-fHhetmy0sNHOg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:41:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72=HdsTfQt5DWKf065pENN0xrOwvKq+T3JpHdyyRkPVx8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jason,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
> - If not, is clang-format ever going to be fixed to quit adding them?

`ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros` was added in LLVM 11 (and
`SpaceBeforeParensOptions` in LLVM 14, which gives even more
fine-grained control).

So it is coming -- the question is whether we wait a bit until LLVM 11
is the minimum supported version (nowadays LLVM 10) or we are willing
to require LLVM 11.

Cheers,
Miguel