Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHmME9ofzanQTBD_WYBRW49d+gM77rCdh8Utdk4+PM9n_bmKwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72=hXXvzfYz-1EdgDNBVfYMiRp2RbjjNF=wwiiPVU+jmuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <3cbaf145ee577f017cf7aea953c9dd1eb88ed4b4.camel@perches.com>
 <CANiq72=bfYHM6XjQZ9dG_auahA_w59naEXM+VZHGm0m=_7nOqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9pWGsc5wLzNK5pe4gVLPNb4uUWYF8AARK8_K=WYLwdGfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9p6q5MxLy-_1KaDWz8ksQYAUev1UvaQ-fHhetmy0sNHOg@mail.gmail.com> <e67388e4bdd25ca5ccb4cf20df0527d82ba31277.camel@perches.com>
In-Reply-To: <e67388e4bdd25ca5ccb4cf20df0527d82ba31277.camel@perches.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:41:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72nyGijSO8ShcDx5eg=O1+_hO9-gOgrqmoDYhc9K0Mojow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Joe,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:05 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>
> Doubtful as it's likely the .clang-format for_each list is
> just out of date for your particular for_each type use and
> the scripted bit that it uses to create them hasn't be

I will send an update.

> updated in awhile.  Also that scripted bit only works on files
> in include/ and not anything locally defined.
>
> [...]
>
> So it has false positives for some functions and not macros.

Yeah, for `clang-format` I tried to be conservative having only
`include/`, but we could change that.

Cheers,
Miguel