Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282113AbRKWKmX>; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 05:42:23 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282110AbRKWKmM>; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 05:42:12 -0500
Received: from [212.3.242.3] ([212.3.242.3]:54030 "HELO mail.i4gate.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S282107AbRKWKmC>;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 05:42:02 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011123102630.00a947d8@pop.gmx.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:27:39 +0100
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: DevilKin <devilkin@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] omnibus header cleanup
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111221957400.1491-100000@duckman.distro.co
 nectiva>
In-Reply-To: <20011122214636.A9790@cantrip.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

At 19:58 22/11/2001 -0200, you wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Nathan Myers wrote:
>
> > Last week, I posted [1] patches ([2],[3]) to fix undisciplined macro
> > definitions in 116 header files.  His Linusness has not picked them
> > up, through several preN releases, nor commented.  I see four choices:
>
>Actually, just today he wrote that he'll only be applying
>"life threatening" patches that fix real bugs, so I guess
>something like your bug would be more of a thing to submit
>once 2.5.0 is out ...

Or wait until the 2.4.x kernel tree is handed over to someone else, then 
you could try resubmitting these patches.
I can't blame Linux for wanting to get on with 2.5 :oPP (I'm looking 
forward to that, so I have numerous ways to screw my systems again :oPPPP)

DK

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/