Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp1158278pxb; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:05:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzob4WjR5MbvKDMTQGT4+kNMU/ftqwjJWHWHcv8lbT6dn8U6QMDA1B2+axtZhqmu5FiwMcn X-Received: by 2002:a63:cc48:: with SMTP id q8mr3754543pgi.474.1642791929929; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:05:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1642791929; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lVhdyGDpM3SVsOT51EzEuPPxIwRSHgtObBwQDrTa+UqLxvs5+VXjrzLsIvMQPLVw1q 8Sb1Fhi2cDETLbyVryvRsfrYcCkbEYSS8Jc+NxugYC3D1hh8Gsu/lEQWdOaytzsWSDpH MhC6U7ec2OAm4AzyOPcYyqH90h2nMrq3D/4bzFyOhfdDx9XSaZcI2ntSO4bLHidQiytw gdJAu4DGEA3DsNYgt/eOPALMf6JwwfCm5mM8OqGt1l3kuv4K/3Zs2JowbUX4wScQ2Vzj JjHuCmg4mlSRW/oqvHtHHo9C62FLBPt+SrnYy0uEsktHnNHnx58FS7jz2VY+eHr3db5L 2wUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=XTBGrT6dDz8lTv6NS16IoDqDZTqQ4wrV7znvNCXbVqU=; b=OQqANOjz1I+r4SzkwuabzZNOYE053u3c2gWqfxHH2tLn/36XriAdf8byBDLFcn4S68 xMyrDS6ZFRol2D34V4IvK/L5ACQUNPy6dGaWxc/TBWIE+E8OiENVfzRvdmocKPj6PBwq IVVahVUFocpYBqeZiTInG6dYwku+0cd80XBAO7K8MecPCCXQNWwdeZOpIA0qLJvdznvm Y5+j06Q9p6d4Qoa1RAfG9PH9pBLT2yozKBiV9hJAAYJ/b7XWRUie34tIe4HY5VwX02Q5 hJyVpSnqMTcW5gfyLc2nYjWDJ21kLnSEl+KcKkxQDAJPOqvlzbEq+tNBjcsCbefrMGk3 +RTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pg13si9210304pjb.63.2022.01.21.11.05.16; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:05:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1353162AbiASJrS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:47:18 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:35852 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346503AbiASJrL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:47:11 -0500 Received: from dggeme755-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Jf14J6LXzzccZF; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:46:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.110.136] (10.67.110.136) by dggeme755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.21; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:47:09 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: entry: Save some nops when CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI is not set To: Mark Rutland CC: , , , , , , , References: <20220107085536.214501-1-heying24@huawei.com> <20220112032410.29231-1-heying24@huawei.com> <20220119093525.GB42546@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> From: He Ying Message-ID: <784a864e-e7e5-4ce5-ec78-850b523c23b0@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:47:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220119093525.GB42546@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.110.136] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggeme755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.101) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2022/1/19 17:35, Mark Rutland 写道: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 02:40:58PM +0800, He Ying wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Ping. Any comments? > The patch looks fine, but as it's the middle of the merge window people > are busy and unlikely to look at this for the next few days. > > Generally it's a good idea to wait until rc1 or rc2, rebase atop that, > and post the updated patch. Stuff like this usually gets queued around > rc3/rc4 time. OK. Thanks for your comment. > >> 锟斤拷 2022/1/12 11:24, He Ying 写锟斤拷: >>> Arm64 pseudo-NMI feature code brings some additional nops >>> when CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI is not set, which is not >>> necessary. So add necessary ifdeffery to avoid it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: He Ying > FWIW: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > Mark. > >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 4 ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S >>> index 2f69ae43941d..ffc32d3d909a 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S >>> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif >>> str w21, [sp, #S_SYSCALLNO] >>> .endif >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI >>> /* Save pmr */ >>> alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING >>> mrs_s x20, SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1 >>> @@ -307,6 +308,7 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING >>> mov x20, #GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET >>> msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, x20 >>> alternative_else_nop_endif >>> +#endif >>> /* Re-enable tag checking (TCO set on exception entry) */ >>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE >>> @@ -330,6 +332,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif >>> disable_daif >>> .endif >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI >>> /* Restore pmr */ >>> alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING >>> ldr x20, [sp, #S_PMR_SAVE] >>> @@ -339,6 +342,7 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING >>> dsb sy // Ensure priority change is seen by redistributor >>> .L__skip_pmr_sync\@: >>> alternative_else_nop_endif >>> +#endif >>> ldp x21, x22, [sp, #S_PC] // load ELR, SPSR > .