Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752747AbXBEGpG (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 01:45:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752742AbXBEGpF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 01:45:05 -0500 Received: from a222036.upc-a.chello.nl ([62.163.222.36]:42394 "EHLO laptopd505.fenrus.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747AbXBEGpE (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 01:45:04 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2541 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:45:04 EST Subject: Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux? From: Arjan van de Ven To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:02:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1170655334.3073.1227.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 760 Lines: 16 On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what > is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used > on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I asked the right folks and the word I got was "Soon". The code we have needs some major cleanups before it's suitable for lkml posting... but it'll be there soon. We're working on the cleanups full time.... We'll send an update when we're further along - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/