Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp1189389pxb; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:51:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWX7Csfrut8PzJO1ZRwd8RIOKghzyGAFT77d65Xr361udV0HKRzWp2EAhMEXKxqmuGF89X X-Received: by 2002:a63:d245:: with SMTP id t5mr3866853pgi.215.1642794673733; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:51:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1642794673; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ag/9cQdCgJ+1eY8MG+JwlziEPGySTSGVK/JnTHA4kHKD7kZ8fVsDaS/xB9vM1ExoM7 IOYaCA98qQ+1speWsCVpozWEoye/4P6efcFKORZyyFHV//7gaT7pbOUJUmUj2thPaFqt lSFdB1KczbXOCYy4KnPs1A5q46hVGPVwbihs8rQirhdFdezHNxq52noTfpXewKXJEE9Y SRehrsKySDBGDhZku1Fvs4vd4JAuvm8FaFoq0hYjnWH9twGNpUYJZXVCoz+eG6LlJ2LS 0GN54NcVwtajnTHvOyt6S1ZmpyNChGcCWEihGynbw89FQRkrteZfqImCJNjBh/LTeNXs Amyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; b=LdTfrQSeEQ580ssIrjJuL0mGZyUxFfWWAO3Gao70/HYRQ6K87+H46mWrnzkOIRTu0I HwEEONOf3Gj2uDzS4FKH4eUj9m+AWjXc/e5FeTAr6k1lc+M3K3TSk53FMBpeNo9yPT2V WM7C/ldeN4BOZX0XO5NNVy6xdzoNfnLx/04/GE114+1RYNUwmrH6pMXfuSuAf/NA6yOT kyodkR+yp1VK1Txs9Z4yFd7iBPqfgPVUm7P3uS3jBr4R1qLDMhsOHn5t8YdUryV7DXn/ 6MeE/PHJcgIlahgJzCa++ZQEMH22LVbs/Cmq8JWxuavkwMKnieU9Km648zqgz/jouiJE v60Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=m6Ls6d+Y; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d2si7402451pgb.289.2022.01.21.11.51.00; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:51:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=m6Ls6d+Y; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356243AbiASRBQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:01:16 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:39020 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243637AbiASRBP (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:01:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5BD40053 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:01:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1642611668; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=m6Ls6d+Y7Cjt9FjfcigDcsV0viL8Djf11XJfjHvtNa65b4Lwb/6JJJa/De7PymTjt 38fD1cg78rcfrNNUkd5/JxNGQODUB3HR/QO6cATBskpvJKoKvV3BqxArCE32PiIMar HbqC2kLPlAJmuMpjG2wC3byUNnel2atnKomdu/m5lO5GGeQ5x9Z8+5wvcObeExXKQz bhhINtDYzR/gzh2GCDyN9uC0wLRzGtSQxXQFkbSaBEnUFdWoNCMVA/h+MmlwJMWkWa +AAgTVfg1FjTUJXh21F+23TAE4iTZyGeX8M66J956adbAM8YzEYHNaEVGukydbq8ZJ FJM8a5zZRNg3g== Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id el8-20020a056402360800b00403bbdcef64so3109794edb.14 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; b=M21pc/eLjuDnbvtUTbNjGAUdm9y8TceOZxakCjxTwL4/x5Zd81nylXNFOSREXHnES5 VfKL4dsj0UTS4fJIQEK9Cp56fdPUyIPbayUqG9DEtTbtj6jZjrJ+3OJIsE+h6ircy4wa 2Uwzb+0vFNo6ZvSSALTjoqNt7mPrbJFDXiNEwswNIXN2kVTIi3qAbUIJ0MzRdHeZVHpo qMP+gJ3UHXGJFZMchLSGTY+eyPAG9OL9GSpAUld5Dm7kRUJ8kO/yvgZP8BwrfCjO5jWw fqFjmMFh0wNa4aP6+957Nkw+dDSrz0OkoC1PHDB7Q8Vz1APAKBXaQAfMZ5uMygk8eo9K OJXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+DvT76nsk34Ds0JsDocAb0/j4mH/6UDgNbm5yNMOsekiXIjjg GroZm//XwOplq67Tn2qSPZcgROdDR6Ju/G9+0PtUjVRQRdXyoSdX+cYal6K64nyCKZFhv88kX6W BPerMKR+Zy9wPPMUmNu/SEuSEHkbKloTGTnqwt8CLmqjW43vyKXqfkks9bw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28e:: with SMTP id w14mr32087790edq.53.1642611667380; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28e:: with SMTP id w14mr32087767edq.53.1642611667167; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:00:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 To: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Sam Protsenko , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. > > > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in > > the soc tree, > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. > > Yep, will be sent up today most likely. > > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the > > contents (anything > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended > > up in the "late" branch. > > > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen > > no indication of any problems so far. > > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the > late branch gets merged. :) Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach? Best regards, Krzysztof