Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
 <CAPLW+4n-1H5Yu3wQaus-UJ_VW_TjHrNUHaPCGCMURXg8EqxjyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a1ou-ZdrXN0MHQoJ+gGbvhXT-e2qt96_f9M8VwrdX0pAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOesGMgF3S5_XsWjEqq=-zfYXwOWFpFNA6afL81wceRUA_0FeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+Eumj5sosSkCCANOVqN8fVUDFaSNtB7+f95o+FAp7w6rM4A=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+Eumj5sosSkCCANOVqN8fVUDFaSNtB7+f95o+FAp7w6rM4A=A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:29 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOesGMiDqBPeNp8u_V0P6z0q+sHWhzwr+FbXrzXCRjnKu59TdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
        arm-soc <arm@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:01 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko
> > > <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Olof, Arnd,
> > > >
> > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in
> > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me.
> > >
> > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in
> > > the soc tree,
> > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days.
> >
> > Yep, will be sent up today most likely.
> >
> > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the
> > > contents (anything
> > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended
> > > up in the "late" branch.
> > >
> > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen
> > > no indication of any problems so far.
> >
> > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes
> > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional
> > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the
> > late branch gets merged. :)
>
> Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to
> base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I
> wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach?

If needed you can base it on Linus' last merge commit of arm-soc
contents for the first set of fixes (or your topic branch that you
sent the code up on), but it's also OK to wait if they're minor
bugs/fixes.


-Olof