Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To:     Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
Cc:     Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: eliminate unreliable __builtin_frame_address(1)
References: <20220117154433.3124-1-changbin.du@gmail.com>
        <C2470F2D-9E45-49D7-A03B-E6A7BB4B9738@jrtc27.com>
        <87v8yg6lhf.fsf@igel.home>
        <AAAA7852-EBCA-47A3-B74E-A425023468C6@jrtc27.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:44:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <AAAA7852-EBCA-47A3-B74E-A425023468C6@jrtc27.com> (Jessica
        Clarke's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:05:13 +0000")
Message-ID: <8735lj78wu.fsf@igel.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Jan 19 2022, Jessica Clarke wrote:

> Leaf functions by definition don’t have callees that are trying to read
> their frame pointer so aren’t relevant here.

??? __builtin_frame_address(1) is about the caller, not the callee.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."