Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 23:04:05 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
        Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>, Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>,
        Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
        Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
        Raju Rangoju <rajur@chelsio.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/string_helpers: Consolidate yesno()
 implementation
Message-ID: <Yeh8xRCcR7D1xdxz@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220119072450.2890107-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
 <20220119072450.2890107-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
 <YefXg03hXtrdUj6y@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
 <20220119100635.6c45372b@gandalf.local.home>
 <YehllDq7wC3M2PQZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20220119160017.65bd1fa5@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220119160017.65bd1fa5@gandalf.local.home>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 04:00:17PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:25:08 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I say keep it one line!
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>  
> > 
> > I believe Sakari strongly follows the 80 rule, which means...
> 
> Checkpatch says "100" I think we need to simply update the docs (the
> documentation always lags the code ;-)

The idea of checkpatch change is for old code to avoid tons of patches
to satisfy 80 rule in (mostly) staging code. Some maintainers started /
have been using relaxed approach.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko