Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
To:     robh@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org
Cc:     kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi_csi port numbering
Date:   Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:33:24 +0100
Message-Id: <20220121093326.2388251-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

hi Shawn and all interested,

This is a fix for an embarrassing bug that slipped into commit
bcadd5f66c2a ("arm64: dts: imx8mq: add mipi csi phy and csi bridge descriptions")
and commit fed7603597fa ("arm64: dts: imx8mq-librem5: describe the selfie cam").

When preparing the imx8mq.dtsi description I only tested with port@1
being connected to the csi bridge, but what I sent said port@0.

I have this on my list for a while and want to sort this out now. I'm
sorry for the inconvenience. Until now imx8mq-librem5 is the only user
(maybe because of this :).

thank you,

                              martin


Martin Kepplinger (2):
  arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi_csi bidirectional port numbers
  arm64: dts: imx8mq-librem5: fix mipi_csi1 port number to sensor

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-librem5.dtsi | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi         | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2