Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Remove EINT handler for Exynos850 ALIVE and CMGP gpios
Date:   Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:46:51 +0100
Message-Id: <164293835975.31601.16620899683024964008.b4-ty@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220114203757.4860-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
References: <20220114203757.4860-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:37:57 +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> GPIO_ALIVE and GPIO_CMGP blocks in Exynos850 SoC don't have EINT
> capabilities (like EINT_SVC register), and there are no corresponding
> interrupts wired to GIC. Instead those blocks have wake-up interrupts
> for each pin. The ".eint_gpio_init" callbacks were specified by mistake
> for these blocks, when porting pinctrl code from downstream kernel. That
> leads to error messages like this:
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] pinctrl: samsung: Remove EINT handler for Exynos850 ALIVE and CMGP gpios
      commit: 96f79935015cf3d7ca6fabf63cd13b8af45a7713

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>