Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964795AbXBEWUV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:20:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964923AbXBEWUV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:20:21 -0500 Received: from kirby.webscope.com ([204.141.84.54]:53717 "EHLO kirby.webscope.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964857AbXBEWUT (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:20:19 -0500 Message-ID: <45C7ACAB.6060408@linuxtv.org> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:16:11 -0500 From: Michael Krufky User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Chris Wright , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Zwane Mwaikambo , Justin Forbes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wedgwood , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , stable@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review References: <20070106022753.334962000@sous-sol.org> <45C624D2.9030403@linuxtv.org> <20070205214332.GB18230@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20070205214332.GB18230@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2036 Lines: 44 Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: >> Chris Wright wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release. >>> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and >>> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. >>> >>> These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the >>> Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable@kernel.org >>> to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list, >>> also email us. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Mon Jan 8 02:30 UTC. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to keep >> the last two stable kernels up-to-date. Have I been wasting my time fwd'ing >> 2.6.18.y patches? > > It was dropped a while ago, sorry. > > I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18 > release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.) Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y, if you don't mind holding off a day or two (wont have time to prepare these until tomorrow evening)... One of them is a security fix, that allows a non-root user to hang the kernel given the correct circumstances. Maybe you guys can make some sort of announcement before the -stable kernel is closed. I know that now that 2.6.20 is released, implicitly 2.6.18.y is closed... but it's been a long while since the last 2.6.18.y release, so I wasn't sure if patches were still being accepted. Regards, Michael Krufky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/